FlockionFlockion
    Risk Management

    Risk intelligence that never sleeps

    Flockion lets risk teams run continuous monitoring, automate third-party assessments, and produce audit-ready documentation — with human oversight built into every decision.

    Talk to our team Enterprise options

    Where risk teams lose time and visibility

    Manual processes that create gaps — and make it impossible to stay ahead of risk.

    Risk frameworks exist on paper but are rarely enforced consistently across business units

    Identifying emerging risks requires manual research across dozens of news sources and databases

    Control testing is periodic, not continuous — gaps go undetected until they become incidents

    Third-party vendor risk assessments are time-consuming and inconsistently scored

    Model risk governance documentation is laborious to produce and hard to keep current

    Scenario analysis and stress testing outputs take weeks to compile and format for committees

    Agent workflows for risk teams

    Continuous monitoring, automated assessments, and always-on intelligence.

    Operational Risk

    Continuous control monitoring

    Agents continuously test controls against defined thresholds, flag deviations, and generate structured remediation reports — replacing periodic manual testing cycles.

    Emerging Risk

    Emerging risk radar

    Monitors news, regulatory announcements, geopolitical signals, and industry publications. Surfaces relevant emerging risks before they reach your risk register.

    Third-Party Risk

    Vendor risk assessment team

    A multi-agent team that researches suppliers, scores financial health, checks sanctions and ESG flags, and produces structured risk assessments at scale.

    Model Risk

    Model risk documentation agent

    Drafts model validation documentation, tracks version history, maps usage to business lines, and assembles packages for model risk committees — automatically.

    Stress Testing

    Scenario analysis compiler

    Assembles scenario inputs from multiple data sources, runs structured analysis, and formats executive-ready outputs for risk and ALCO committee presentations.

    Risk Intelligence

    Risk policy Q&A assistant

    A knowledge agent grounded in your risk framework and policies. Answers queries from risk owners instantly — always referencing the correct policy version.

    Governance controls that risk committees trust

    Every agent action is traceable, approvable, and auditable — by design.

    HITL for risk decisions

    Agents flag decisions above your risk appetite threshold. Every human approval is logged with timestamp, rationale, and decision maker.

    Org Policy guardrails

    Set content restrictions, model risk ceilings, PII redaction, and approved tool lists — enforced across all agents platform-wide.

    Immutable audit log

    Every agent action, tool call, and decision logged. Exportable audit packages for internal audit, regulators, and committee review.

    Workflow version history

    Track every version of every risk workflow. Compare runs, identify drift, and demonstrate governance consistency over time.

    Multi-agent risk teams

    Ready-to-configure team blueprints for risk functions.

    Third-Party Risk Review Team

    Risk Manager · Research Analyst · Sanctions Checker · ESG Scorer · Report Writer

    Operational Risk Monitoring Team

    Control Monitor · Threshold Watcher · Deviation Flagging · Remediation Drafter

    Model Risk Governance Team

    Governance Manager · Documentation Drafter · Validation Tracker · Committee Pack Writer

    Emerging Risk Intelligence Team

    Research Manager · News Monitor · Regulatory Scanner · Risk Summariser

    Agent output examples

    Risk packs rendered in chat and Feed

    The same structured output contract powers control testing in chat, risk signals in the Feed, proof, export, and task handoff.

    Analyst chat response

    Control Testing Team

    Generated from governed control evidence and audit logs

    Risk Management·Control Test Live canvas

    Q3 control testing pack

    Two key controls failed effectiveness testing; remediation owners are assigned.

    Needs ReviewHigh 86% confidenceFreshPending Review
    2

    Findings

    observed

    Evidence confidence

    GRC compliance command center

    Frameworks · risks · approvals · audits · incidents · business continuity

    high
    Mapped requirements
    3
    Evidence gaps
    2
    Overdue actions
    5
    Open incidents
    2

    Framework coverage

    Standard and control implementation status

    DORA44/56
    12 open78%
    ISO 27001:202280/93
    13 open86%
    NIS232/50
    18 open64%

    Prioritized assignments

    Approvals, measures, documents, and controls

    Approve ICT register ownership
    Approval · CRO · Today
    high
    Complete logging control
    Measure · Security · 3 days
    open
    Review IT policy
    Document · CISO · 5 days
    medium

    Audit program

    Planned, active, and completed assurance work

    ISMS certification auditplanned
    15–25 Sep10/79 tests
    DORA readiness reviewactive
    01–12 Aug32/50 tests

    Requirement mapping and evidence lineage

    Trace every obligation through policy, control, and proof

    Obligationrequirementpolicycontrolevidence
    Resilience testing
    DORA Art. 11 · Resilience
    !
    ✓
    !
    !
    ICT third-party register
    DORA Art. 28 · TPRM
    !
    ✓
    !
    !
    Incident classification
    DORA Art. 17 · Security
    !
    ✓
    ✓
    ✓

    Enterprise risk matrix

    Likelihood → · impact ↑

    0
    0
    2
    1
    0
    0
    4
    2
    0
    8
    0
    0
    9
    0
    0
    0
    Deadline exposure79%

    Incident and remediation queue

    Reportability, criticality, owners, and next action

    Corporate laptop lost at airporthigh
    19 Sep 14:25 · Security
    NIS2 assessment1/3 actions
    Fire in server roomcritical
    18 Sep 03:40 · BCM
    DORA reportable3/7 actions

    Business continuity thresholds

    RTO, MTPD, recovery readiness

    Customer invoicingmedium
    RTO 4hMTPD 12h
    Identity serviceshigh
    RTO 1hMTPD 4h

    Control Effectiveness

    1/3 passed

    AC-04 Access recertification

    passEvidence: includedOwner: it_security

    FR-11 Journal entry threshold review

    failEvidence: exceptionThreshold: > $50kOwner: finance_control

    OP-07 Vendor onboarding checks

    failEvidence: partialOwner: procurement

    Open Findings

    2 findings

    Journal entries above threshold not dual-approved

    open

    Three entries bypassed the dual-approval workflow in Q3.

    Owner: finance_control· ERP audit log

    Two vendors onboarded without sanctions screening

    in progress
    Owner: procurement· Vendor master

    Control failure propagation

    Connected intelligence canvas · trace dependencies and impact paths

    5

    Entities

    4

    Links

    5

    Attention

    5 exceptions
    Journal review to Financial report: weakensVendor checks to Onboarding: exposesFinancial report to Residual risk: raisesOnboarding to Residual risk: raisesJournal review · Control · failedJournal reviewControl3 failsVendor checks · Control · failedVendor checksControl2 gapsFinancial report · Process · affectedFinancial reportProcessHighOnboarding · Process · affectedOnboardingProcessMediumResidual risk · Risk · highResidual riskRisk78/100
    ControlProcessRisk
    • Journal review to Financial report: weakens
    • Vendor checks to Onboarding: exposes
    • Financial report to Residual risk: raises
    • Onboarding to Residual risk: raises
    Reviewed Feed post

    Operational Risk Signal Agent

    Approved output pack - public snapshot redacts restricted findings

    Risk signal
    Risk Management·Risk Signal Live canvas

    Operational risk signal: control failure cluster

    A cluster of related control failures raises residual operational risk.

    78

    B

    Signal grade

    ApprovedHigh 83% confidenceFreshApproved
    2

    Actions

    observed

    Evidence confidence

    Emerging risk horizon and velocity radar

    Likelihood × impact · velocity · horizon · cause-to-consequence paths

    0–24 months
    Impact ↑Risk velocity
    Supplier concentration
    Freight capacity
    Market controls
    Likelihood →
    Driver → event → consequence
    Port disruption
    Single source
    Low safety stock
    Material concentration event
    Production stop
    Lead-time shock
    Access loss
    Control resilience
    Dual sourcing38%
    Safety stock62%
    Alternate route71%

    Residual Risk Score

    78/100

    Threshold: 70· exceeded

    Control failures
    82
    Remediation lag
    74
    Coverage
    68
    Residual risk trend
    Q4 24Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25020406080
    Residual risk trend chart data
    LabelRisk score
    Q4 2461
    Q1 2565
    Q2 2571
    Q3 2578

    Control breach response

    Decision path from automated detection through remediation and risk-owner closure.

    Decision path from automated detection through remediation and risk-owner closure.

    Top Residual Risks

    2 risks
    RiskTaxonomyInherentResidualOwner
    OR-12Unauthorized journal entriesmitigatingOperationalhighmediumfinance_control
    TP-05Unscreened vendor onboardingopenThird-partyhighhighprocurement

    Recommendations

    Enforce dual-approval gate on entries above threshold

    high impact
    85% confidenceOwner: finance_control

    Backfill sanctions screening for new vendors

    medium impact
    80% confidenceOwner: procurement

    Make your risk function proactive

    Talk to our team. We'll map a deployment that fits your risk framework, governance requirements, and data environment.

    Talk to Sales View Enterprise options

    We use essential cookies to keep you signed in and optional analytics to improve the product. Cookie Policy